formation: be related to endothermic reactions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, shape
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stalagmite
Weight: 0.56
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, pyramid
Weight: 0.32
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to endothermic reactions 1.00
be related to reactions 0.91
is endothermic 0.90
relate to absorbance 0.79
is exothermic 0.77
be called condensation reaction 0.76
differ from other macromolecules 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(process, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(structure, differ from other macromolecules)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(structure, relate to absorbance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(process, is endothermic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(structure, relate to absorbance)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(structure, differ from other macromolecules)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(process, is endothermic)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(structure, differ from other macromolecules)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(structure, relate to absorbance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(process, is endothermic)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(structure, differ from other macromolecules)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(structure, relate to absorbance)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(formation, be related to reactions)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(formation, be related to reactions)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(formation, be related to reactions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(formation, be called condensation reaction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(formation, be called condensation reaction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(formation, is exothermic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(formation, be called condensation reaction)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(formation, is exothermic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(formation, is exothermic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(formation, be called condensation reaction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(formation, is exothermic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to reactions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(structure, relate to absorbance)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(structure, differ from other macromolecules)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(structure, relate to absorbance)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(formation, be related to endothermic reactions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(structure, differ from other macromolecules)