fortune teller: be at fairground

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, entertainer
Weight: 0.57
, fraud
Weight: 0.57
, entertainment
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fortune
Weight: 0.33
, thief
Weight: 0.33
, wise man
Weight: 0.32
, robber
Weight: 0.32
, old lady
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fairground 1.00
be at park 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(entertainment, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fortune teller, be at fairground)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fortune teller, be at fairground)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(entertainment, be at fairground)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(thing, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(entertainment, be at fairground)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(entertainment, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fortune teller, be at fairground)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fortune teller, be at fairground)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fortune teller, be at fairground)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(fortune teller, be at fairground)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(entertainment, be at fairground)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(entertainment, be at fairground)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(fortune teller, be at fairground)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)