fossil: be at museum of natural history

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evidence
Weight: 0.63
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.57
, object
Weight: 0.56
, information
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings footprint
Weight: 0.54
, raptor
Weight: 0.33
, comet
Weight: 0.33
, meteorite
Weight: 0.33
, artifact
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at museum of natural history 1.00
be at museum 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be at museum)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be at museum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(artifact, be at museum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(artifact, be at museum)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(artifact, be at museum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(artifact, be at museum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fossil, be at museum of natural history)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fossil, be at museum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fossil, be at museum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fossil, be at museum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be at museum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be at museum of natural history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fossil, be at museum of natural history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(artifact, be at museum)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fossil, be at museum of natural history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(artifact, be at museum)