:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, be at medow)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fox, be at a)
Similarity expansion
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(fox, be at boc)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at boc)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at nantucket)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at nantuckey)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fox, be at nantucket)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fox, be at boc)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fox, be at nantuckey)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fox, be at outside)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at outside)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fox, be at outside)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fox, be at boc)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, be at outside)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at a)
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fox, be at a)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at a)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rabbit, be at medow)