fox: be at wood

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, man
Weight: 0.65
, prey
Weight: 0.64
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wood 1.00
be at hole in wood 0.88
tail rabbit in wood 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wild animal, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fox, be at wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at wood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at wood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(wild animal, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fox, be at wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fox, be at wood)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at hole in wood)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fox, tail rabbit in wood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fox, tail rabbit in wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fox, be at wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at wood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(fox, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at wood)