fox: have sharp claws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sharp claws 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp claws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp claws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(fox, have sharp claws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, have sharp claws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have sharp claws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp claws)