fox: survive in wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, predator
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in wild 1.00
has state wild 0.87
survive in winter 0.82
survive winter 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(coyote, has state wild)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(coyote, survive winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(coyote, has state wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(coyote, has state wild)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(coyote, survive winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coyote, survive winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fox, survive in wild)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, survive in winter)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fox, survive winter)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fox, survive in winter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fox, survive winter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fox, survive in winter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fox, survive winter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in winter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, survive in wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coyote, has state wild)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fox, survive in wild) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coyote, survive winter)