fractal: be important to math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, mathematics
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.49
, concept
Weight: 0.47
Siblings design pattern
Weight: 0.33
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32
, extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to math 1.00
be related to math 0.94
relate to math 0.91
be important in computer science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fractal, be important to math)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(fractal, relate to math)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fractal, relate to math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fractal, relate to math)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fractal, relate to math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fractal, be important in computer science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(fractal, be important in computer science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fractal, be related to math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be important in computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fractal, be important in computer science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fractal, be related to math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(fractal, be related to math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be related to math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be important to math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fractal, be important to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fractal, be important to math)