fractal: be utilized in technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, mathematics
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.49
, concept
Weight: 0.47
Siblings design pattern
Weight: 0.33
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32
, extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be utilized in technology 1.00
be utilized in science 0.92
be used 0.82
be used in world 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(matrix, be used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(matrix, be used)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(matrix, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(fractal, be utilized in technology)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fractal, be used)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fractal, be used in world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be used in world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fractal, be used)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(fractal, be used)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fractal, be used in world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fractal, be used in world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fractal, be utilized in science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fractal, be utilized in science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fractal, be utilized in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fractal, be utilized in technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fractal, be utilized in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(matrix, be used)