fracture: be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.68
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, cause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laceration
Weight: 0.52
, clavicle
Weight: 0.48
, femur
Weight: 0.42
, tibia
Weight: 0.39
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population 1.00
be higher than other 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(clavicle, be higher than other)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(clavicle, be higher than other)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(clavicle, be higher than other)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be in athletes treated more aggressively than general population)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(clavicle, be higher than other)