fragmentation: affect species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, function
Weight: 0.57
Siblings erosion
Weight: 0.34
, polarization
Weight: 0.33
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect species 1.00
affect interior species 0.89
differ from reproduction in reptiles 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fragmentation, affect species)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, affect interior species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fragmentation, affect interior species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, differ from reproduction in reptiles)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, affect interior species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fragmentation, affect interior species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fragmentation, differ from reproduction in reptiles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, differ from reproduction in reptiles)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fragmentation, differ from reproduction in reptiles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, affect species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(fragmentation, affect species)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(fragmentation, affect species)