fragmentation: be considered security risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, function
Weight: 0.57
Siblings erosion
Weight: 0.34
, polarization
Weight: 0.33
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered security risk 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fragmentation, be considered security risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(fragmentation, be considered security risk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(fragmentation, be considered security risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fragmentation, be considered security risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, be considered security risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(fragmentation, be considered security risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fragmentation, be considered security risk)