fraternity: do hazing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents campus
Weight: 0.59
, body
Weight: 0.59
, organization
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings university
Weight: 0.34
, greek
Weight: 0.32
, association
Weight: 0.32
, family member
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
do hazing 1.00
have hazing 0.99
initiate without hazing 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(fraternity, do hazing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, initiate without hazing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fraternity, initiate without hazing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fraternity, initiate without hazing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fraternity, initiate without hazing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, have hazing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fraternity, have hazing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fraternity, have hazing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fraternity, have hazing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, do hazing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fraternity, do hazing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fraternity, do hazing)