fraud: be underreported as crime

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scandal
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, financial institution
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fortune teller
Weight: 0.57
, corruption
Weight: 0.34
, barrack
Weight: 0.34
, bribery
Weight: 0.34
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be underreported as crime 1.00
is underreported 0.95
be crime 0.78
is crime 0.78
is unreported 0.77
go unreported 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bribery, be crime)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is crime)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is crime)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(corruption, is crime)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bribery, is crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bribery, is crime)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bribery, be crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bribery, be crime)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fraud, be underreported as crime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fraud, be underreported as crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(corruption, is crime)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(bribery, is crime)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fraud, be underreported as crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bribery, be crime)