free radical: be bad for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.62
, immune system
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings no
Weight: 0.60
, singlet
Weight: 0.44
, free time
Weight: 0.35
, free kick
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for us 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(free kick, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(free kick, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(free kick, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(free radical, be bad for us)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(free radical, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(free radical, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(free radical, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(free radical, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(free radical, be bad for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(free radical, be bad for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(free radical, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(free kick, has quality good)