freezer: be burn bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.56
Siblings refrigerator
Weight: 0.39
, fridge
Weight: 0.38
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be burn bad 1.00
is burn 0.94
burn taste bad 0.92
burn happen 0.91
burn smell 0.88
burn occur 0.87
be burned bad 0.87
burn taste 0.87
be burned food bad 0.85
be burned meat bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(freezer, be burn bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(freezer, is burn)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(freezer, is burn)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(freezer, burn occur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(freezer, is burn)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(freezer, burn happen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(freezer, burn smell)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(freezer, burn happen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(freezer, burn happen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(freezer, burn occur)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(freezer, be burned food bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(freezer, burn smell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(freezer, be burned food bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burn happen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(freezer, be burned food bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(freezer, be burned food bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(freezer, be burned meat bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(freezer, is burn)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(freezer, be burned meat bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(freezer, burn occur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(freezer, be burned meat bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(freezer, burn smell)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(freezer, be burned meat bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(freezer, burn taste bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burn smell)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(freezer, burn occur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(freezer, be burn bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(freezer, be burn bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(freezer, be burn bad)