freezing point: be alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.53
, liquid
Weight: 0.49
, temperature
Weight: 0.42
Siblings liquid water
Weight: 0.32
, cold water
Weight: 0.31
, hot water
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be alike 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(liquid water, be alike)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(liquid water, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(liquid water, be alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(freezing point, be alike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(freezing point, be alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(freezing point, be alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(freezing point, be alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(liquid water, be alike)