french fry: become soggy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
become soggy 1.00
is soggy 0.97
get soggy 0.96
get mushy 0.76
is sticky 0.75
go sticky 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(okra, go sticky)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(okra, is sticky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(okra, go sticky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(okra, go sticky)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(okra, is sticky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(okra, is sticky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(french fry, become soggy)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is soggy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(french fry, is soggy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(french fry, is soggy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(french fry, get soggy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(french fry, get soggy)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, become soggy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(french fry, become soggy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(okra, go sticky)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, become soggy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(okra, is sticky)