french fry: has physical part fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fat 1.00
make people fat 0.87
contain fat 0.83
contain most fat 0.82
has physical part quick 0.81
be good for dieting 0.77
be on keto diet 0.77
be essential in diet 0.76
is diet 0.76
be essential to diet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vegetable, be essential to diet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be essential to diet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be essential to diet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has physical part quick)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dieting)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(okra, has physical part quick)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(okra, be on keto diet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(vegetable, be essential to diet)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(okra, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(okra, has physical part quick)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cauliflower, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has physical part quick)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(okra, be on keto diet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(okra, be on keto diet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for dieting)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for dieting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(french fry, has physical part fat)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french fry, make people fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(french fry, contain most fat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(french fry, make people fat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(french fry, contain fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(french fry, make people fat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(french fry, make people fat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(french fry, contain most fat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(french fry, contain most fat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(french fry, contain fat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, contain fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, contain most fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(french fry, contain fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vegetable, be essential to diet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has physical part quick)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(okra, has physical part quick)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(okra, be on keto diet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for dieting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(vegetable, be essential to diet)