french fry: is terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible 1.00
take awful photos 0.77
has quality bad 0.77
is nasty 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(french fry, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(french fry, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(french fry, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(french fry, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(french fry, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality bad)