french restaurant: be likely to serve snail

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.76
, place
Weight: 0.57
, must
Weight: 0.48
, food
Weight: 0.45
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be likely to serve snail 1.00
be used to eat snail 0.91
be used to eat frog leg 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat snail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat snail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat frog leg)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat snail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat frog leg)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat frog leg)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to eat frog leg)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(french restaurant, be used to eat snail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be likely to serve snail)