frequency: be inversely proportional

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.68
, parameter
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.65
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
, quantity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.36
, density
Weight: 0.35
, wavelength
Weight: 0.35
, volume
Weight: 0.34
, jitter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inversely proportional 1.00
is inversely proportional 1.00
be inversely proportional to length 0.96
be correlated with density 0.80
have inverse relationship 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(wavelength, is inversely proportional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(volume, be inversely proportional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(volume, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(volume, be inversely proportional)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(wavelength, is inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wavelength, is inversely proportional)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(frequency, be inversely proportional)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(frequency, be correlated with density)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(frequency, be correlated with density)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(frequency, be correlated with density)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be correlated with density)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(frequency, be inversely proportional)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(wavelength, is inversely proportional)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(volume, be inversely proportional)