frequency: be notused for data transmission in computer networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.68
, parameter
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.65
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
, quantity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.36
, density
Weight: 0.35
, wavelength
Weight: 0.35
, volume
Weight: 0.34
, jitter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be notused for data transmission in computer networks 1.00
carry more data 0.80
have more bandwidth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(frequency, carry more data)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(frequency, carry more data)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(frequency, carry more data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(frequency, have more bandwidth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(frequency, carry more data)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(frequency, have more bandwidth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(frequency, have more bandwidth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frequency, have more bandwidth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(frequency, be notused for data transmission in computer networks)