frequency: be related to velocity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.68
, parameter
Weight: 0.66
, characteristic
Weight: 0.65
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
, quantity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings amplitude
Weight: 0.36
, density
Weight: 0.35
, wavelength
Weight: 0.35
, volume
Weight: 0.34
, jitter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to velocity 1.00
is velocity 0.97
be related to amplitude 0.77
be related to temperature 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(density, be related to temperature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(density, be related to temperature)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(density, be related to temperature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(frequency, be related to velocity)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to amplitude)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(frequency, be related to amplitude)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(frequency, be related to amplitude)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(frequency, be related to amplitude)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to velocity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(frequency, be related to velocity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be related to velocity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(density, be related to temperature)