fresh fruit: be in sydney expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.76
, food
Weight: 0.73
, beverage
Weight: 0.68
, flavor
Weight: 0.68
Siblings orange juice
Weight: 0.78
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.72
, blueberry
Weight: 0.70
, mango
Weight: 0.69
, cherry
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in sydney expensive 1.00
be in sydney 0.97
be expensive in japan 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mango, be expensive in japan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mango, be expensive in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mango, be expensive in japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mango, be expensive in japan)