fresh: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.53
, grocery store
Weight: 0.48
, variety
Weight: 0.47
, film
Weight: 0.45
Siblings fresh food
Weight: 0.37
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.36
, canned food
Weight: 0.32
, ground beef
Weight: 0.32
, pet food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fresh fruit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(fresh, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(fresh, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fresh, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fresh, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fresh, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fresh, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has quality better)