friend: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cousin
Weight: 0.73
, supporter
Weight: 0.71
, companion
Weight: 0.70
, blessing
Weight: 0.67
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.70
, uncle
Weight: 0.67
, lord byron
Weight: 0.67
, nephew
Weight: 0.66
, neighbor
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is great 0.81
has quality function 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
be better in fo4 0.77
is well liked 0.77
is good show 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(companion, be better in fo4)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cousin, is well liked)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cousin, is well liked)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(companion, be better in fo4)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(companion, be better in fo4)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cousin, is well liked)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, has quality evil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(nephew, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(companion, be better in fo4)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cousin, is well liked)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(nephew, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nephew, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(neighbor, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(neighbor, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(friend, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(friend, is best)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(friend, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(friend, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(friend, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cousin, is well liked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(companion, be better in fo4)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nephew, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(neighbor, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cousin, is well liked)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(companion, be better in fo4)