fringe: has quality benefit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.61
, show
Weight: 0.60
, series
Weight: 0.57
, television show
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.31
, free radical
Weight: 0.31
, deadwood
Weight: 0.31
, maverick
Weight: 0.31
, right wing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality benefit 1.00
has quality good 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deadwood, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(right wing, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maverick, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(free radical, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(free radical, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(free radical, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maverick, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(maverick, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(right wing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(right wing, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deadwood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(deadwood, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(fringe, has quality benefit)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fringe, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fringe, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fringe, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fringe, has quality benefit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(free radical, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(deadwood, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maverick, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fringe, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(right wing, has quality good)