frog: be adapted to water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to water 1.00
be adapted move in water 0.96
be adapted 0.94
be adapted to life 0.91
be adapted in sea 0.91
be adapted for life 0.91
be adapted live 0.90
be adapted on land 0.90
be adapted move 0.90
be adapted survive 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(frog, be adapted to water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tree frog, be adapted live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, be adapted live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be adapted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tree frog, be adapted live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(frog, be adapted to water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lizard, be adapted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lizard, be adapted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(frog, be adapted to water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(frog, be adapted to water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(frog, be adapted to water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lizard, be adapted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(frog, be adapted to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tree frog, be adapted live)