frog: be like fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reptile
Weight: 0.78
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, tree frog
Weight: 0.65
, amphibian
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, turtle
Weight: 0.39
, toad
Weight: 0.39
, saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, otter
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like fish 1.00
kill fish 0.90
be born as fish 0.86
ride fish 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(otter, kill fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(otter, kill fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(otter, kill fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(frog, be like fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(frog, be like fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(frog, be like fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(frog, be like fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(otter, kill fish)