frost: be bad for freezer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weather
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, poet
Weight: 0.57
, writer
Weight: 0.53
Siblings robert frost
Weight: 0.36
, cold weather
Weight: 0.36
, rain
Weight: 0.35
, bad weather
Weight: 0.34
, good weather
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for freezer 1.00
be in freezer 0.97
is freezer 0.97
be in freezer white 0.95
is free freezer 0.94
accumulate in freezer 0.89
is freezer icing up 0.87
is free freezer icing up 0.87
is freezer icing 0.86
is free freezer icing 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(frost, be in freezer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(frost, be in freezer)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(frost, be in freezer)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frost, is freezer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(frost, is freezer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frost, is freezer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(frost, be in freezer white)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(frost, be in freezer white)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(frost, be in freezer white)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(frost, be in freezer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(frost, is free freezer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(frost, is free freezer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(frost, is freezer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(frost, is free freezer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frost, accumulate in freezer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(frost, accumulate in freezer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(frost, accumulate in freezer)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(frost, be in freezer white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(frost, accumulate in freezer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(frost, is free freezer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(frost, is freezer icing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(frost, is free freezer icing up)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(frost, is free freezer icing up)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(frost, is free freezer icing up)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(frost, is freezer icing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(frost, is freezer icing up)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frost, is free freezer icing up)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(frost, is free freezer icing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(frost, is freezer icing up)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(frost, is freezer icing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(frost, is free freezer icing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(frost, is freezer icing up)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(frost, is freezer icing up)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(frost, is free freezer icing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(frost, is free freezer icing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(frost, is freezer icing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(frost, be bad for freezer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(frost, be bad for freezer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(frost, be bad for freezer)