frost: was great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weather
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, poet
Weight: 0.57
, writer
Weight: 0.53
Siblings robert frost
Weight: 0.36
, cold weather
Weight: 0.36
, rain
Weight: 0.35
, bad weather
Weight: 0.34
, good weather
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great 1.00
has quality good 0.81
is prime good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(rain, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(good weather, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(good weather, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(good weather, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(rain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rain, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(frost, was great)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(frost, is prime good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(frost, is prime good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(frost, is prime good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(frost, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(frost, is prime good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(frost, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(frost, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(frost, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(frost, was great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(frost, was great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(good weather, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(frost, was great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rain, has quality good)