frosting: has physical part hair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.54
, stuff
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, sweet
Weight: 0.52
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.50
Siblings icing
Weight: 0.51
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.35
, flan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hair 1.00
has physical part quick 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dessert, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(frosting, has physical part hair)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dessert, has physical part quick)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dessert, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(frosting, has physical part hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(frosting, has physical part hair)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(frosting, has physical part quick)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(frosting, has physical part quick)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(frosting, has physical part quick)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(frosting, has physical part quick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(frosting, has physical part hair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(frosting, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dessert, has physical part quick)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(frosting, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dessert, has physical part quick)