frosting: vanilla

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.54
, stuff
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, sweet
Weight: 0.52
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.50
Siblings icing
Weight: 0.51
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, custard
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.35
, flan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
vanilla 1.00
has sweetness sweet 0.76
is frosting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dessert, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(frosting, vanilla)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(white chocolate, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(frosting, vanilla)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has sweetness sweet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dessert, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has sweetness sweet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(dessert, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(white chocolate, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(frosting, vanilla)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(frosting, vanilla)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(frosting, is frosting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(frosting, is frosting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(frosting, has sweetness sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(frosting, is frosting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(frosting, has sweetness sweet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(frosting, has sweetness sweet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(frosting, has sweetness sweet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(frosting, is frosting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(frosting, vanilla)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has sweetness sweet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dessert, has sweetness sweet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has sweetness sweet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(frosting, vanilla)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dessert, has sweetness sweet)