fruit bat: have sharp teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bat
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, bird
Weight: 0.60
Siblings baseball bat
Weight: 0.39
, vampire bat
Weight: 0.38
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, kookaburra
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sharp teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bat, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have sharp teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bat, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bat, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, have sharp teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fruit bat, have sharp teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have sharp teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit bat, have sharp teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(fruit bat, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part teeth)