fruit: be at refridgerator

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, crop
Weight: 0.61
, soft drink
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coconut
Weight: 0.73
, apple juice
Weight: 0.70
, melon
Weight: 0.67
, strawberry
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at refridgerator 1.00
be at fridge 0.87
be at refrigerator 0.87
be at in refrigerator 0.86
be at freezer 0.79
be at kitchen 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(strawberry, be at refrigerator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(strawberry, be at freezer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(strawberry, be at refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(strawberry, be at refrigerator)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(strawberry, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(strawberry, be at freezer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(fruit, be at refridgerator)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(fruit, be at in refrigerator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at in refrigerator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fruit, be at fridge)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at fridge)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fruit, be at fridge)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fruit, be at fridge)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fruit, be at in refrigerator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(fruit, be at in refrigerator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fruit, be at kitchen)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fruit, be at kitchen)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(fruit, be at kitchen)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fruit, be at refridgerator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(strawberry, be at refrigerator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be at refridgerator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strawberry, be at freezer)