fruit: be smash into liquid drink

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, crop
Weight: 0.61
, soft drink
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coconut
Weight: 0.73
, apple juice
Weight: 0.70
, melon
Weight: 0.67
, strawberry
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smash into liquid drink 1.00
be make into juice 0.79
be squeeze into juice 0.76
be created by squeeze liquid out of apple 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be created by squeeze liquid out of apple)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(apple juice, be created by squeeze liquid out of apple)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be created by squeeze liquid out of apple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fruit, be make into juice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fruit, be make into juice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fruit, be squeeze into juice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be squeeze into juice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fruit, be squeeze into juice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be make into juice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(fruit, be make into juice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fruit, be squeeze into juice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be smash into liquid drink)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(apple juice, be created by squeeze liquid out of apple)