fry: be served with burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, cooking
Weight: 0.48
, place
Weight: 0.48
Siblings fried egg
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, eggs benedict
Weight: 0.34
, stew
Weight: 0.34
, steak
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served with burgers 1.00
cost more than burgers 0.85
was named fries 0.83
be called fries 0.82
was named french fries 0.78
be called french fries 0.77
is fried 0.77
were once called freedom fries 0.76
is fried twice 0.76
is delicious 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(steak, is delicious)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(steak, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(steak, is delicious)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(fry, be served with burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(fry, be called fries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fry, be called fries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fry, be called fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fry, be called fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fry, is fried)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fry, cost more than burgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fry, is fried)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fry, was named fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fry, be called french fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fry, be called french fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fry, is fried)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fry, were once called freedom fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fry, was named fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(fry, were once called freedom fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fry, be called french fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fry, were once called freedom fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fry, be called french fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fry, was named french fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fry, cost more than burgers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fry, is fried twice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fry, were once called freedom fries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fry, was named fries)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fry, was named french fries)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fry, was named fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fry, cost more than burgers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fry, is fried twice)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fry, is fried twice)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fry, cost more than burgers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fry, is fried twice)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fry, was named french fries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fry, was named french fries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fry, is fried)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fry, be served with burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fry, be served with burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(steak, is delicious)