frying pan: is uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pan
Weight: 0.80
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.70
, utensil
Weight: 0.64
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.64
, weapon
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.39
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.39
, wok
Weight: 0.38
, skillet
Weight: 0.37
, microwave
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is uk 1.00
be legal in canada 0.80
be necessary for india 0.78
is japan 0.76
be on japan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frying pan, is uk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(weapon, be necessary for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frying pan, is uk)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be legal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frying pan, is uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pan, is uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(weapon, be legal in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(weapon, be necessary for india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be legal in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pan, is uk)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be necessary for india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is uk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(weapon, be necessary for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is uk)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be legal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(microwave oven, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(frying pan, is uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(frying pan, is uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(weapon, be legal in canada)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pan, is uk)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(weapon, be necessary for india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pan, is uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(weapon, be legal in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(frying pan, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(weapon, be necessary for india)