frying: is pan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.48
, cooking
Weight: 0.44
, process
Weight: 0.43
, way
Weight: 0.38
, preparation
Weight: 0.36
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.32
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.30
, boiling water
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, burning
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pan 1.00
be with wok 0.79
is pans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cooking, be with wok) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(frying, is pan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cooking, be with wok)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with wok)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cooking, be with wok) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(frying, is pan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(frying, is pan)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying, is pans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(frying, is pans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(frying, is pans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(frying, is pans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(frying, is pan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(frying, is pan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cooking, be with wok)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(frying, is pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cooking, be with wok)