function: has quality functions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality functions 1.00
be necessary function of things 0.82
be necessary function of living things 0.79
be important function in plant 0.78
is quality 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be important function in plant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be necessary function of living things)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be necessary function of things)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(cell division, be necessary function of things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cell division, be necessary function of things)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(cell division, be necessary function of living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cell division, be necessary function of living things)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cell division, be important function in plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cell division, be important function in plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(function, has quality functions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cell division, be necessary function of things)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cell division, be necessary function of living things)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cell division, be important function in plant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(function, has quality functions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)