function: have asymptotes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, message
Weight: 0.59
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.79
, cell division
Weight: 0.67
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.67
, birthday party
Weight: 0.67
, operating system
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have asymptotes 1.00
have one y-intercept 0.84
be time-consuming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(process, be time-consuming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(function, have asymptotes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(process, be time-consuming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(process, be time-consuming)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(process, be time-consuming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(function, have asymptotes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(function, have asymptotes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(function, have one y-intercept)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(function, have one y-intercept)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(function, have one y-intercept)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(function, have one y-intercept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, have asymptotes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(function, have asymptotes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(process, be time-consuming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(function, have asymptotes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(process, be time-consuming)