fungi: be classified as heterotrophs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pathogen
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.34
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.38
, bacterium
Weight: 0.36
, microorganism
Weight: 0.36
, staphylococcus
Weight: 0.36
, bacillus
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as heterotrophs 1.00
be classified 0.98
is classified 0.97
be classified as living 0.92
be considered as saprobes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pathogen, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pathogen, be classified)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pathogen, be classified)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be classified)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microorganism, be classified)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bacterium, is classified)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pathogen, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bacterium, is classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bacterium, is classified)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fungus, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fungus, be classified)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microorganism, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(microorganism, be classified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fungi, be classified)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fungi, is classified)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fungi, is classified)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fungi, be classified)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fungi, is classified)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fungi, is classified)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fungi, be classified)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be considered as saprobes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fungi, be considered as saprobes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(fungi, be considered as saprobes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fungi, be considered as saprobes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pathogen, be classified)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(microorganism, be classified)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fungus, be classified)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bacterium, is classified)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pathogen, be classified)