fungi: be classified as heterotrophs like animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pathogen
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.34
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.38
, bacterium
Weight: 0.36
, microorganism
Weight: 0.36
, staphylococcus
Weight: 0.36
, bacillus
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as heterotrophs like animals 1.00
be like animals 0.88
be different than animals 0.84
be different from animals 0.84
is animals 0.83
affect animals 0.82
be similar to animals 0.82
be different from humans 0.77
be good for humans 0.77
be useful to humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bacterium, be useful to humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fungus, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fungus, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fungus, affect animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bacterium, be useful to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bacterium, be useful to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(fungi, be like animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fungi, be different from animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be like animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fungi, be similar to animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fungi, be like animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(fungi, be like animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be different from animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fungi, be similar to animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fungi, be different from animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be similar to animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fungi, be different from animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fungi, be similar to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fungus, affect animals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fungi, be classified as heterotrophs like animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bacterium, be useful to humans)