fungi: rotting vegetation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pathogen
Weight: 0.61
, plant
Weight: 0.34
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.38
, bacterium
Weight: 0.36
, microorganism
Weight: 0.36
, staphylococcus
Weight: 0.36
, bacillus
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
rotting vegetation 1.00
grow rotting 0.85
grow on decaying logs 0.80
grow on trees 0.78
decompose leaves 0.77
help trees 0.77
help in lichen 0.76
live in moist areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fungus, grow on trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fungus, grow on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fungus, grow on trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fungi, rotting vegetation)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(fungi, grow rotting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fungi, grow rotting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fungi, grow on trees)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fungi, grow rotting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fungi, grow on trees)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fungi, rotting vegetation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fungi, rotting vegetation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fungi, rotting vegetation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fungus, grow on trees)