fungus: be at damp forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.66
, microorganism
Weight: 0.65
, germ
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.54
, creature
Weight: 0.54
Siblings salmonella
Weight: 0.63
, mold
Weight: 0.61
, termite
Weight: 0.57
, bacillus
Weight: 0.48
, insect
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at damp forest 1.00
be at wet forest 0.93
be at damp wood 0.91
be at damp area 0.90
be at damp dark area 0.87
be at dark damp area 0.87
be at in forest 0.87
be at forest 0.87
be at damp spot 0.86
be at damp warm place 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(mold, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(insect, be at in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(termite, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(insect, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(insect, be at in forest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(termite, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(termite, be at forest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(mold, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mold, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fungus, be at damp forest)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp wood)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp area)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp wood)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp area)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at dark damp area)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp dark area)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp dark area)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fungus, be at dark damp area)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp warm place)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp warm place)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fungus, be at damp wood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fungus, be at forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fungus, be at damp area)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fungus, be at dark damp area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fungus, be at damp dark area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(fungus, be at damp warm place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at damp wood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at damp area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at dark damp area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at damp dark area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fungus, be at damp warm place)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fungus, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fungus, be at damp forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(termite, be at forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insect, be at in forest)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mold, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fungus, be at damp forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)