future: be at our child

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contract
Weight: 0.58
, movie
Weight: 0.57
, world
Weight: 0.56
, number
Weight: 0.56
Siblings happy
Weight: 0.47
, country
Weight: 0.30
, complex number
Weight: 0.30
, armageddon
Weight: 0.30
, movie star
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at our child 1.00
care only about her own need 0.80
be defined as place we live 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(world, be defined as place we live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(future, be at our child)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(world, be defined as place we live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(world, be defined as place we live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(movie star, care only about her own need)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(world, be defined as place we live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(future, be at our child)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(movie star, care only about her own need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(movie star, care only about her own need)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(future, be at our child)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(future, be at our child)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(future, be at our child)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(world, be defined as place we live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(movie star, care only about her own need)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(future, be at our child) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(world, be defined as place we live)