gain: be with zero volume

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.57
, control
Weight: 0.56
, reduction
Weight: 0.56
, amount
Weight: 0.56
Siblings loss
Weight: 0.61
, ordinary
Weight: 0.46
, accretion
Weight: 0.46
, increase
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with zero volume 1.00
is zero 0.82
be in stroke volume 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(loss, is zero)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, is zero)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in stroke volume)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(loss, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(loss, is zero)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(increase, be in stroke volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(increase, be in stroke volume)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(operating expense, is zero) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(operating expense, is zero)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(gain, be with zero volume)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be with zero volume)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loss, is zero)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(operating expense, is zero)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(gain, be with zero volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(increase, be in stroke volume)