gallery: be at london

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, attraction
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.61
, exhibition
Weight: 0.61
Siblings louvre
Weight: 0.48
, main artery
Weight: 0.40
, corner shop
Weight: 0.33
, amusement park
Weight: 0.33
, shop
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at london 1.00
be at england 0.82
be at paris 0.78
be at florida 0.77
be at new york city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(corner shop, be at england)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(corner shop, be at england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(corner shop, be at england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(gallery, be at london)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(gallery, be at new york city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(gallery, be at paris)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(gallery, be at paris)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gallery, be at paris)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(gallery, be at new york city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(gallery, be at paris)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(gallery, be at new york city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gallery, be at new york city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gallery, be at london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(gallery, be at london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gallery, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(corner shop, be at england)