gallery: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	store Weight: 0.64 , attraction Weight: 0.62 , place Weight: 0.61 , exhibition Weight: 0.61
Siblings	louvre Weight: 0.48 , main artery Weight: 0.40 , corner shop Weight: 0.33 , clothing store Weight: 0.33 , home depot Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
be good company work for	0.78
be good company work	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(exhibition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(gallery, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(exhibition, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(exhibition, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(exhibition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(gallery, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work for)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(home depot, be good company work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(gallery, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(gallery, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(exhibition, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(gallery, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(exhibition, has quality good)